TedWest

McCain - Hero - Film At Eleven

Comments

I'll second this opinion.

His war record is what impresses me most about John McCain. Like you, Ted, I really dislike some of his policies and he’s too laissez-faire economically for me. But when you realize that before 1980 the most time he had spent anywhere was Hanoi, and put up with the crap the Viet Cong gave him, then it does suggest an incredibly strong character.

[this is good]

Jack: There is virtually no "Laissez-faire" proponents left in American except members of the Libertarian Party and a few think tanks like the Cato Institute, FEE, Reason Foundation and the Heritage Foundation.

Relatively speaking in comparison to Keynesian economics, of course

Planning and deficit spending are two pillars holding up the US Capitol. ;)

Jack,

"he’s too laissez-faire economically for me"

I don't want to rush to interpret what you meant by that, so I'd appreciate some clarification. I ask because to me, McCain is too much in favor of government solutions and for using government to block free-market solutions, but I may have misunderstood your meaning.

Case in point: I just read that McCain may be planning a "global warming tour." If true, I would consider that a deal-breaker, which only means that it will be four consecutive elections in which I will have not voted for a Presidential candidate.

Hi Ted: I may well be wrong (and it seems I am). Here, my impression of Sen. McCain is that he is prepared to let the market do everything (e.g. subprime), but I am prepared to be corrected since I hear less in general about the candidates. I have never felt that where we are right now we should allow the market to simply take its course, though of course that is an ideal.

Now I understand, Jack, and that's for being so candid. My big concern with McCain is that he'll use government in the wrong places. I would agree that the subprime mess may need some government involvement, but it appears that if the Dems get their way, it will be over-involvement as only they can.

But now as I say that, I'm mindful of the fact that the Republicans are no longer prepared to automatically cede Dems the spending/regulatory crown year after year.

Thank you, Ted, especially for giving me a chance to clarify that. The Democratic solutions do sound far too messy for me, too. I think Americans will have to vote on the “lesser evil”, and on that basis neither Obama nor Clinton have any appeal to me.

Jack,

I meant to say "thanks" for being so candid. Sorry the typo made me sound patronizing.

No worries, Ted: I didn’t read that in at all.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

Advertisement